RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘corked’

Faulty Wine or Nose

17 Aug

Finding fault with a wine is a snob’s dream. I remember one incident a few years ago, when a friend of mine, who had recently entered the wine trade, obviously wanted to impress his female dining companion and make his mark as a man who knew a thing or two about wine. It was the second bottle of an Italian red we had ordered and although, I have to admit, it did smell a little earthy, it was by no means corked. Undeterred, my friend insisted on calling over the sommelier.

Much theatrical posturing ensued in which the sommelier flamboyantly sniffed the cork before pouring himself a tasting measure of the wine in question and, after tasting, confidently declared to the table: “This is not corked.” I had to agree but took no pleasure in watching my friend’s expression crumple. I can’t remember whether he actually brought himself to drink the aforementioned bottle, but I do recall enjoying the wine very much.

The problem with identifying wine faults such as cork taint, oxidation, sediment and tartrate crystals or brettanomyces (a subject I will return to later) is that more often than not there is no fault with the wine at all. It just doesn’t taste quite how the drinker expected it to. Take our “earthy” Italian wine. If one is used to a softer, approachable, supple form of wine such as an Australian Merlot instead of the bitter, tannic and dry flavor of an Italian grape variety such as Nebbiolo, then naturally the Italian wine can come as a bit of a shock to the palate.

Similarly, when a wine is served with small pieces of cork floating inside the glass, it isn’t actually corked, it is just that the cork has crumbled and fallen into the glass. These may seem basic rules to some but I wager right now there is someone beckoning the sommelier over, arguing that there are small bits floating on his wine and he will under no circumstances drink “corked wine.”

So how does one identify corked wine? Firstly, it is worth pointing out that in the U.K. this is becoming less of a problem as more wine producers are reverting to screwcaps. Unfortunately for those wines bottled with a cork, there are still corks that are contaminated with TCA, a chemical compound 2,4,6-trichloroanisole that gives the wine an unmistakable pungent, mouldy odor.

By far a more common fault, in my experience, is the wine that has been ruined through oxidation. This is when a small amount of air has seeped in through the cork, leaving the wine smelling “sherried” or without any discernible fruit characteristics. Rarer these days, but still prevalent in some wines, is the occurrence of opening a bottle to find it is “off,” displaying a foul-smelling nose. When I worked in the wine trade a few years back, I learned that this was because of the wine being contaminated by bacteria left over in the winery.

Sediment collected at the bottom of a wine glass can be unpleasant to drink but is entirely natural and expected in wines that are aged. Decanting the wine should avoid this experience. Small tartrate crystals that appear in white wine are also nothing to worry about; they form naturally in the winemaking process.

One fault beloved of wine snobs is that of “brett,” or brettanomyces, to give it its full name. Hugely controversial, brett is a yeast that imparts a distinctive flavor to a wine, best described in my experience as a sort of smoky bacon flavor. It is found predominantly in red Bordeaux, and for many the taste actually improves the wine, adding complexity and character. Those who don’t like the taste, and there are many, often say that it is a result of bad winemaking.

But as Master of Wine Anthony Barne says: “It is a taste that is almost endemic in older clarets and one we all came to know and love as part of the taste of red Bordeaux.

“If you go back 20 years, it was really the Australians who were perhaps more scientific winemakers then the Bordelais were in general. They had identified brett as what they considered to be a wine fault, and then they were finding it in a lot of clarets and were always looking for an angle as to why Australian wines were superior to French wines. But unless it is really strong, I don’t see it as a huge problem, I must say.”

A view echoed by Simon Staples, sales director at Berry Bros. & Rudd wine merchants, who says, “It’s a fault I rarely come across and if I had to be honest, if you mention it, I don’t think most people know what you are talking about.” Which is precisely why the wine snobs love it so much.

 

By: Will Lyons [The Wall Street Journal 8/20/10]

Share
 
 

To Tastevin or not to Tastevin?

07 Jul
The Pour

When the First Sip Is the Sommelier’s, Not Yours

By ERIC ASIMOV
Published: July 6, 2010

STEPHEN SILBERLING, a tax lawyer who considers himself a knowledgeable wine drinker, could not contain his astonishment as he told me of his recent experience in a New York restaurant. He had ordered a 2007 Chapoutier Côtes du Rhône Belleruche, a wine he and his date had enjoyed so much the previous week that they decided to drink it again. As they sipped their first glass, however, they both thought the wine tasted different, and they debated whether it was flawed.

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

 

Listening to the conversation, the sommelier piped up.

“He said, ‘I’ve tasted the wine, it’s fine,’ ” Mr. Silberling recalled. “He tasted the wine? I was very surprised. I had never heard of that being done before.”

Few issues of wine etiquette seem to cause as much consternation as the increasingly common practice of a sommelier taking a small sip of wine, usually unbidden, to test for soundness. Diners often are surprised to learn that their bottle has in effect been shared with the restaurant, even if it’s just the smallest amount.

The practice, which is more common at high-end restaurants with ambitious wine lists, can make diners uncomfortable. Some believe the restaurant may be taking advantage of them by consuming wine that they have bought. Others feel demeaned, that their role of assessing the wine has been usurped.

“I know I’d rather be doing the tasting because I trust myself,” Mr. Silberling said.

It’s a touchy subject, particularly because, from the restaurant’s point of view, it’s all for the consumer’s benefit. Some restaurants believe that, since they are more familiar than most consumers with the wines they offer, they can save diners from accidentally accepting a bottle that is not up to standard. “I think it’s an important service,” said Daniel Johnnes, wine director for Daniel Boulud’s Dinex Group. “We want the sommelier to assure that the wine gets to the customer as it is intended.”

I have noticed this practice more often in the last decade, but in fact it was one of the original tasks of the sommelier.

“It goes back hundreds of years, when the role of sommeliers was to ensure that kings or royalty didn’t get poisoned,” said Evan Goldstein, a wine educator and former president of the American chapter of the Court of Master Sommeliers, an organization dedicated to raising the standards of beverage service. “My understanding is that the tastevin was put on a chain and put around the neck of the sommelier exactly for that purpose.”

Ah, the tastevin, the shallow silver cup that today largely evokes the image of the supercilious sommelier. In the United States, where most restaurants have tried to relax the formality of wine service, one rarely sees a tastevin. Le Bernardin in New York is one of the few that still employs it as a working tool.

“I want to ensure the wine I serve is in perfect condition,” said Aldo Sohm, Le Bernardin’s chef sommelier. “We use it. It’s not just for show.”

Allowing the sommelier a sniff or small taste of a wine is a sensible precaution for a restaurant to take, I think, both from its own point of view and from the customer’s. No good restaurant wants to serve flawed or bad wine, and tasting the wine first is a step toward preventing that.

Many people, even those who know something about wine, are not comfortable suggesting that a bottle is flawed. They might feel uncertain, or embarrassed, and would rather endure a bottle they are not enjoying than send it back. If a sommelier can prevent that, I think it’s worth the sip that’s sacrificed.

At RN74, a top wine-oriented restaurant in San Francisco, sommeliers check every bottle, said Christie Dufault, who is a sommelier there and a wine and beverage instructor at the Culinary Institute of America in Napa Valley. She is still haunted by a southern Rhône wine she once served a table without having tasted it. After they left, having consumed only half the bottle, she checked it and found it was badly corked.

“I’ve seen consumers become way more knowledgeable, but I recommended a wine that was completely foreign to these people,” she said. “They didn’t recognize that the wine was flawed. We don’t want that scenario to ever be repeated.”

Nonetheless, some consumers, even educated ones, are suspicious of the practice.

“I’ve never seen it, and I would say I’m happy I’ve never seen it,” said Joe Roberts, who blogs about wine at 1winedude.com. “I would imagine the first reaction would be, somebody’s trying to cop a taste of my expensive wine.”

Ms. Dufault realizes the practice may require sommeliers to step into delicate territory.

“We want customers to realize that good sommeliers are looking out for their best interests,” she said. “It’s our job to observe our guests. If I observe a guest who really knows wine, then maybe this service isn’t necessary.”

Fred Dexheimer, a master sommelier whose company, Juiceman Consulting, advises restaurants on wine service, believes sniffing and tasting before serving is a sound practice.

“I want the guest to have the best experience possible,” he said. “It’s like a chef making sure all the sauces are correct.”

But Mr. Dexheimer said he has seen the ritual abused by sommeliers who have poured themselves a little more wine than perhaps was necessary. He said sommeliers have to understand that some wines are more prone to problems than others, and therefore are more important to check. He mentioned unfiltered white wines, for example, or wines whose cork might have some visible mold on it. I might add to that list wines like white Burgundies, which are prone to oxidation problems that some consumers may not recognize.

Even if a sommelier has tasted a wine and found it sound, that does not ensure that a customer will like it. So what happens if a sommelier believes a wine has no problem, but the customer rejects it, as was the case with Mr. Silberling?

“The rule is, if the customer is not happy with the wine, take the wine back,” Mr. Johnnes said. “It doesn’t happen so frequently that we can’t do that.”

He suggests engaging in conversation with the customer. It may be that a wine needs to breathe a bit, or needs to be gently cooled. But if those options are not satisfactory, he said, just take the wine back.

Some bottles are obviously flawed, but others can be borderline cases. What is undetectable to some people, even to experts, is off-putting to others. Above all, he said, sommeliers should never argue with customers, even if they believe a bottle is sound.

Mr. Dexheimer remembers doing just that as a young sommelier. “I still have guilty nightmares about that 10 years later,” he said. “Take the rest of that bottle and educate your staff, or pour it by the glass. There are ways to recover from that, but if you make a guest unhappy, you’ll never get that guest back.”

One way of alleviating the mistrust that some customers may feel, he suggested, is simply to alert guests that you, the sommelier, are going to taste the wine to make sure it’s all right.

That would work for Mr. Roberts, the wine blogger. “It would almost go from something that seems malignant to something that’s viewed as good service,” he said.

Communication, Mr. Dexheimer said, is one more way to remove the pretension from wine.

“If you communicate everything you do to the guests, you help to create an atmosphere of trust,” he said. “If you don’t ask permission, you’re going to get in trouble.”

Article was taken from The New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/07/dining/07pour.html?pagewanted=1)

Share